University of Pittsburgh Health Sciences eLearning Environment Internet-based Studies in Education and Research
INTRODUCTION
1/18/24 Anesthesiology GR: Quantity Over Quality: One Institutions Navigation of the Recent Updates in Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade
QUIZ
EVALUATION
CERTIFICATE
Credit Hours: CME 1.00
Anesthesiologists and anesthesiologists-in-training and other anesthesia professionals, nurse anesthetists and anesthesia assistants.
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to:
- Provide definition and clinical consequences of residual neuromuscular blockade
- Summarize the recommendations from the 2023 ASA Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade
- Compare methods of monitoring neuromuscular blockade
- Identify recommended roles of sugammadexvs. neostigmine in neuromuscular blockade reversal
- Apply best available evidence-based practices to avoid residual paralysis in practice setting
Joint Accreditation Statement:
In support of improving patient care, the University of Pittsburgh is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine designates this enduring material activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Each physician should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Other health care professionals will receive a certificate of attendance confirming the number of contact hours commensurate with the extent of participation in this activity.
Suggested Additional Reading
- EikermannM, Vogt FM, Herbstreit F, et al. The predisposition to inspiratory upper airway collapse during partial neuromuscular blockade. Am J RespirCritCare Med. 2007;175(1):9-15.
- BlobnerM, Hollmann MW, LuediMM, Johnson KB. Pro-Con Debate: Do We Need Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring in the Era of Sugammadex?. AnesthAnalg. 2022;135(1):39-48.
- Fortier LP, McKeenD, Turner K, et al. The RECITE Study: A Canadian Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Incidence and Severity of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade. AnesthAnalg. 2015;121(2):366-372.
- SaagerL, MaieseEM, Bash LD, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and consequences of residual neuromuscular block in the United States: The prospective, observational, multicenter RECITE-US study. J ClinAnesth. 2019;55:33-41.
- KotakeY, OchiaiR, Suzuki T, et al. Reversal with sugammadexin the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block. AnesthAnalg. 2013;117(2):345-351.
- DebaeneB, PlaudB, Dilly MP, DonatiF. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizingmuscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1042-1048.
- Thilen SR, WeigelWA, Todd MM, et al. 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuromuscular Blockade. Anesthesiology. 2023;138(1):13-41.
No relationships with industry relevant to the content of this educational activity have been disclosed.
This activity is approved for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™
The University of Pittsburgh is an affirmative action, equal opportunity institution.