University of Pittsburgh Health Sciences eLearning Environment Internet-based Studies in Education and Research
Introduction
Professional Profile Details
5/21/2026 - Anesthesiology Grand Rounds - Can Videolaryngoscopy Effectively Train Direct Laryngoscopy?
Quiz
Evaluation
Certificate
Credit Hours: 0.75
Anesthesiologists and anesthesiologists-in-training and other anesthesia professionals, nurse anesthetists and anesthesia assistants.
Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to:
- Incorporate evidence-based education techniques in teaching direct laryngoscopy
- Increase competence in evaluating results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to incorporate into individual patient care practices
- Reflect and revise order of teaching video vs direct laryngoscopy to achieve earlier trainee competency for patient safety
- Calderon Martinez, Ernesto MDa,*; Ghattas Hasbun, Patricia E. MDb; et al. A comprehensive guide to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Medicine 104(33):p e41868, August 15, 2025. | DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041868
- Prekker ME, Driver BE, Trent SA. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. NEJM 2023 June; 389(5): 418-429. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301601
- Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;129(4):612-623. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.027. Epub 2022 Jul 9. PMID: 35820934; PMCID: PMC9575044.
- Lascarrou JB, Boisrame-Helms J, Bailly A, et al. Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy on Successful First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation Among ICU Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317(5):483–493. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.20603
No relationships with industry relevant to the content of this educational activity have been disclosed.
No relationships with industry relevant to the content of this educational activity have been disclosed.
In support of improving patient care, the University of Pittsburgh is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine designates this enduring material activity for a maximum of 0.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Each physician should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Other health care professionals will receive a certificate of attendance confirming the number of contact hours commensurate with the extent of participation in this activity.
The University of Pittsburgh is an affirmative action, equal opportunity institution.